La valutazione dell’equilibrio e della capacità motoria nel bambino affetto da PCI prima e dopo il trattamento con Tossina Botulinica focale agli arti inferiori, utilizzando il sistema VRRS Khymeia
The assessment of balance and motor skills in children with cerebral palsy before and after treatment with focal Botulinum Toxin in the lower limbs, a proposal for the use of the VRRS Khymeia system
Autori
Bejan Alexandra Ioana (Unione Genitori Italiani contro il tumore dei bambini UGI ODV, Turin, Italy)
Naretto Gabriella Elena (Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Turin, Italy)
Imazio Paola (Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Turin, Italy)
Introduction
Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most frequent causes of motor disability in children. According to the current definition, developed by an international team of experts, cerebral palsy is a group of permanent, but not unchanging, disorders of movement and/or posture and of motor function, which are due to a non-progressive interference, lesion, or abnormality of the developing/immature brain (1-2). According to European data, the average frequency of CP is 2.08 per 1000 live births (3-4). Spasticity, in combination with muscle tightness, weakness, decreased selectivity and reduced motor control, contributes to limitations in ambulation, functional ability, balance, physical fitness and participation (5). Therapeutic management focuses on minimizing disabilities and maximizing goal-related functional performance and participation. Administering Botulinum toxin to spastic muscles is promising to improve gait pattern and functional walking ability in ambulant children with cerebral palsy. This intervention creates a therapeutic window aimed at enhancing not only the gait pattern but also both static and dynamic balance.
Methods
We enrolled 15 patients (10 males and 5 females) with cerebral palsy (7 hemiplegic and 8 diplegic), with an average age of 9 years (ranging from 4 to 18 years) and classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) II (10 patients) and GMFCS III (5 patients). We assessed their motor skills using the Berg Balance Scale, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the VRRS Khymeia technological tool.
Results
We collected the data at two time points: T0 at the time of toxin inoculation and T1 at the check-up one month after inoculation.
The Berg Balance Scale is a test used to assess functional balance and it evaluates both dynamic and static balance through 14 tasks regarding mobility. The scale has been useful in predicting the risk of falls (6).
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility (7).
The Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS) Khymeia is a medical device that allows clinicians to assess postural control and acquire quantitative data. Its operation is based on the principles of Biofeedback and virtual reality and is equipped with the motor, postural and immersive VR modules. During the evaluation the device records and reports the patient’s COP (Center of Pressure) displacement, enabling the saving of numerical charts through which the results of the patient performance can be objectively and measurably evaluated (8).
Discussion and Conclusion
During this timeframe, all patients underwent physical therapy treatments combined with the use of AFO (Ankle-Foot Orthoses). We observed a statistically significant improvement in the scores obtained on the TUG and Berg evaluation scales (95% confidence interval). However, regarding the evaluation with the VRRS Khymeia, there was an increase in the score one month after inoculation, which was not statistically significant.
In conclusion, we can affirm that it is necessary to enrol a larger sample of patients and administer the evaluations (TUG, BERG, and Khymeia) also at 3 and 6 months in order to verify a statistically significant relevance of the evaluation with VRRS Khymeia. We also consider it is important to highlight the increase in the score obtained by patients one month after the inoculation, and we are hopeful to further explore this research.
REFERENCES
- Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Executive Committee for the Definition of Cerebral Palsy. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):571–576. doi: 10.1017/S001216220500112X
- Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 109:8–14.
- Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42:816–824. doi: 10.1017/S0012162200001511
- Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020; 16:1505-1518
- Rachel E. Thomas, Leanne M. Johnston, Leanne Sakzewski, Megan J. Kentish, Roslyn N. Boyd, Evaluation of group versus individual physiotherapy following lower limb intra-muscular Botulinum Toxin-Type A injections for ambulant children with cerebral palsy: A single-blind randomized comparison trial, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volumes 53–54, 2016: 267-278, ISSN 0891-4222
- Miranda-Cantellops N, Tiu TK. Berg Balance Testing. 2023 Feb 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 34662032.
- Ortega-Bastidas P, Gómez B, Aqueveque P, Luarte-Martínez S, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Instrumented Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG)-More Than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;23(7):3426. doi: 10.3390/s23073426. PMID: 37050485; PMCID: PMC10098780.
- Martini G, Beani E, Filogna S, Menici V, Cioni G, Battini R, Sgandurra G. New Technological Approach for the Evaluation of Postural Control Abilities in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Children. 2022; 9(7):957. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9070957