Di Dio Antonio (Università degli studi di Messina)
Bonanno Francesco (Università degli studi di Messina)
Pintaudi Teresa (Università degli studi di Messina)
Ceccio Mariachiara (Università degli studi di Messina)
Cavallaro Filippo (Università degli studi di Messina)
An interesting analogy between two seemingly distant worlds is that of building construction and the clinic. The aim of this work is to make a comparison between the structure of a construction scaffold and an external orthopedic fixator. Although they operate in different contexts, both systems share fundamental principles of support, stability, and adaptability. We want to highlight the importance of temporary structures that provide an important support during the repair process.
A comparative method was used for the analysis, comparing the structures and functions of the construction scaffold with those of the orthopedic external fixator. This comparison has made it possible to highlight the similarities in the design principles and use of both systems.
The analysis revealed several similarities between the construction scaffold and the orthopedic external fixator. Both systems are based on an interconnected structure: in scaffolding, frames interlock to support the building structure while, in the external fixator, the metal components keep the bone stump aligned. Both systems are designed to be modular and adaptable. A scaffold can be built in various ways to accommodate different building shapes and sizes while an external fixator can be fixed to fit the patient’s anatomy and healing needs. In addition, the scaffold provides temporary support during the construction phase, allowing workers to work safely, while the external fixator provides temporary support during all the healing bone process. In both cases, the support is removed once their task is completed. Finally, a scaffold must be safe for workers, ensuring that they can work without risks. Similarly, an external fixator must ensure that bone fragments remain in place ensuring their healing.
This analysis makes clear how the principles of interconnectedness, adaptability, temporary support and stability are fundamental in both contexts. These principles help health care professionals to manage the complexity of bone fractures and ensure effective healing (such as a well-designed scaffold ensures the safe and stable construction of a building). It becomes clear how the interactions between the various structures are critical to achieving favorable outcomes.
